We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Coca-Cola's Bottler Strategy Evolves: What is the Margin Impact?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
KO's refranchising strategy led to a 130-bps increase in Q1 comparable operating margin.
The exit from Philippines bottling and local focus enhanced profitability and resilience.
KO stays aligned with bottlers via joint planning while targeting long-term margin growth.
The Coca-Cola Company (KO - Free Report) is steadily reshaping its global bottling footprint through a long-term refranchising strategy that shifts bottling operations to local partners. This asset-light approach allows the company to focus more on brand building, marketing and innovation, while leaving capital-intensive production and distribution to its bottlers.
In first-quarter 2025, the company reported a 130-basis-point (bps) increase in comparable operating margin, underscoring the efficiency of its refranchising strategy. Management noted that the shift, including last year’s exit from the Philippines bottling operations, contributed to stronger profitability, even as top-line metrics absorbed slight dilution.
The benefits go beyond just financials. Despite global operations, management emphasized that Coca-Cola’s bottling system remains profoundly local, helping it weather trade disruptions and consumer sentiment shifts. By producing and distributing locally, the company reduces exposure to tariffs and logistical disruptions, while enhancing its image as a contributor to domestic economies. For instance, Coca-Cola’s ecosystem supports 860,000 jobs in the United States and more than 575,000 in Brazil, according to recent studies.
Looking ahead, management sees refranchising as a tool to improve capital efficiency while maintaining tight alignment with bottling partners. While refranchising is largely complete, Coca-Cola remains tightly integrated with bottling partners through joint planning and execution. Coca-Cola continues to strike a balance between agility, affordability and profit expansion, an equation it believes will drive long-term, margin-accretive growth.
Is the Bottling Strategy Unique to Coca-Cola?
While Coca-Cola pioneered the asset-light bottling model, competitors like PepsiCo Inc. (PEP - Free Report) and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP - Free Report) have also adopted variations of this strategy to enhance efficiency and focus on brand-led growth.
PepsiCo uses a hybrid bottling strategy, retaining control of key bottling operations through its subsidiary, Pepsi Beverages Company, while also partnering with independent bottlers. This structure gives PepsiCo more control over pricing and execution in critical markets. However, it remains more vertically integrated than Coca-Cola. While the strategy provides flexibility, it limits PepsiCo's margin expansion compared with Coca-Cola’s asset-light model. PepsiCo’s integrated approach helps ensure strong alignment between product innovation and market execution.
Keurig Dr Pepper follows a unique bottling model by leveraging a mix of owned operations and a network of third-party bottlers, including Coca-Cola bottlers. This collaborative distribution system allows KDP to scale efficiently while minimizing capital intensity. Unlike Coca-Cola, Keurig Dr Pepper relies more heavily on shared infrastructure, which broadens reach but can limit direct control. The strategy has supported solid beverage growth, especially in CSDs and premium brands, aligning with Coca-Cola’s asset-light distribution philosophy in parts.
The Zacks Rundown for Coca-Cola
KO’s shares have risen 11.6% year to date compared with the industry’s growth of 5.3%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, Coca-Cola trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 22.43X, significantly higher than the industry’s 17.98X.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for KO’s 2025 and 2026 earnings implies year-over-year growth of 3.1% and 8.3%, respectively. Earnings estimates for 2025 and 2026 have been unchanged in the past 30 days.
Image: Bigstock
Coca-Cola's Bottler Strategy Evolves: What is the Margin Impact?
Key Takeaways
The Coca-Cola Company (KO - Free Report) is steadily reshaping its global bottling footprint through a long-term refranchising strategy that shifts bottling operations to local partners. This asset-light approach allows the company to focus more on brand building, marketing and innovation, while leaving capital-intensive production and distribution to its bottlers.
In first-quarter 2025, the company reported a 130-basis-point (bps) increase in comparable operating margin, underscoring the efficiency of its refranchising strategy. Management noted that the shift, including last year’s exit from the Philippines bottling operations, contributed to stronger profitability, even as top-line metrics absorbed slight dilution.
The benefits go beyond just financials. Despite global operations, management emphasized that Coca-Cola’s bottling system remains profoundly local, helping it weather trade disruptions and consumer sentiment shifts. By producing and distributing locally, the company reduces exposure to tariffs and logistical disruptions, while enhancing its image as a contributor to domestic economies. For instance, Coca-Cola’s ecosystem supports 860,000 jobs in the United States and more than 575,000 in Brazil, according to recent studies.
Looking ahead, management sees refranchising as a tool to improve capital efficiency while maintaining tight alignment with bottling partners. While refranchising is largely complete, Coca-Cola remains tightly integrated with bottling partners through joint planning and execution. Coca-Cola continues to strike a balance between agility, affordability and profit expansion, an equation it believes will drive long-term, margin-accretive growth.
Is the Bottling Strategy Unique to Coca-Cola?
While Coca-Cola pioneered the asset-light bottling model, competitors like PepsiCo Inc. (PEP - Free Report) and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP - Free Report) have also adopted variations of this strategy to enhance efficiency and focus on brand-led growth.
PepsiCo uses a hybrid bottling strategy, retaining control of key bottling operations through its subsidiary, Pepsi Beverages Company, while also partnering with independent bottlers. This structure gives PepsiCo more control over pricing and execution in critical markets. However, it remains more vertically integrated than Coca-Cola. While the strategy provides flexibility, it limits PepsiCo's margin expansion compared with Coca-Cola’s asset-light model. PepsiCo’s integrated approach helps ensure strong alignment between product innovation and market execution.
Keurig Dr Pepper follows a unique bottling model by leveraging a mix of owned operations and a network of third-party bottlers, including Coca-Cola bottlers. This collaborative distribution system allows KDP to scale efficiently while minimizing capital intensity. Unlike Coca-Cola, Keurig Dr Pepper relies more heavily on shared infrastructure, which broadens reach but can limit direct control. The strategy has supported solid beverage growth, especially in CSDs and premium brands, aligning with Coca-Cola’s asset-light distribution philosophy in parts.
The Zacks Rundown for Coca-Cola
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, Coca-Cola trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 22.43X, significantly higher than the industry’s 17.98X.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for KO’s 2025 and 2026 earnings implies year-over-year growth of 3.1% and 8.3%, respectively. Earnings estimates for 2025 and 2026 have been unchanged in the past 30 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Coca-Cola currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.